CryoGlow vs CryoGlow Plus vs CurrentBody: All Three Masks Side by Side
July 30, 2026 · 7 min read


Three masks, one promise: smoother skin without a clinic appointment. But the Shark CryoGlow, its higher-capacity Plus sibling, and the CurrentBody Skin LED Mask are built around genuinely different priorities — rigid versus flexible, blue light versus pure infrared, cooling versus contour. Here is how all three line up.
Side by side
| Feature | CryoGlow | CryoGlow Plus | CurrentBody (S2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Rigid shell | Rigid shell | Flexible liquid silicone |
| LED count | 480 | 560 | 236 |
| Light types | Red, blue, deep infrared | Red, blue, deep infrared | Red, near-infrared, deep near-infrared |
| Under-eye cooling | Yes, InstaChill | Yes, 3 levels | No |
| Acne (blue light) | Yes | Yes | No |
| Eye-area coverage | Standard | Wider crow's-feet coverage | Full-face contour |
| Battery life | Baseline | ~75% longer | Rechargeable, 10-min sessions |
| Session length | 10–20 min | 10–20 min | 10 min |
| FDA clearance | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | First LED mask, mixed concerns | Frequent users, blemishes + ageing | Pure anti-ageing, travel |
The two Shark masks are the same idea at two sizes
The CryoGlow and CryoGlow Plus share their treatment modes, their InstaChill under-eye cooling, and their rigid shell design. What the Plus buys is headroom: 560 LEDs instead of 480, wider coverage around the crow's-feet area, and roughly 75% more battery life between charges. If LED therapy is going to be a several-times-a-week habit, that battery difference is the practical argument for the Plus. For a first mask used a couple of times a week, the original does the same job.
CurrentBody is the outlier
CurrentBody's Series 2 mask skips blue light entirely and adds a third infrared wavelength instead, leaning hard into collagen support and anti-ageing rather than trying to cover acne too. Its flexible silicone body contours to the face, so its 236 LEDs sit closer to the skin than a rigid shell allows — which is why the raw LED count comparison is misleading. It also folds down for travel, something neither Shark mask does.
Cooling has no equivalent
InstaChill under-eye cooling is Shark's genuine differentiator. Both CryoGlow models can run cooling during the same session as the LED treatment to target puffiness; CurrentBody has nothing comparable. If de-puffing tired eyes is part of the goal, that narrows the shortlist to two.
Which one fits
Choose the CryoGlow for a first LED mask covering both blemishes and early fine lines. Choose the CryoGlow Plus if sessions will be frequent and battery life plus wider eye coverage matter. Choose the CurrentBody Skin LED Mask for pure anti-ageing with a soft, travel-friendly fit. All three are FDA-cleared, and all three need consistent use over weeks — none of them is a shortcut.
Prefer the head-to-heads? See CryoGlow vs CryoGlow Plus and CryoGlow Plus vs CurrentBody.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our link, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Shark CryoGlow Plus
Affiliate links. Same price for you, small commission supports VitalHub.
Frequently asked questions
Skincare · July 29, 2026
Shark CryoGlow Plus vs CurrentBody LED Mask
led maskred lightskincareReadSkincare · July 29, 2026
Shark CryoGlow vs CryoGlow Plus: What's Different
led maskred lightskincareReadSkincare · July 24, 2026
Solawave Red Light Therapy: Mask and Wand Explained
red lightskincaredeviceReadGadgets · July 25, 2026
Electric Back Stretcher with Traction: Full Guide & Uses
red lighthome deviceRead